Mark Bee
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior
Ph.D., University of Missouri, 2001
Contact Information
Phone: 612-624-6749
Fax: 612-624-6777
E-mail: mbee@umn.edu
Graduate Faculty Memberships
Ecology, Evolution and Behavior
Research Interests
- Acoustic communication
- Aggression
- Auditory perception and neurophysiology
- Auditory scene analysis and the "cocktail party problem" in animals
- Behavioral plasticity and learning
- Honest signaling
- Sexual selection (female mate choice & male-male competition)
- Sound pattern recognition and sound localization
- Territoriality
- Vocally mediated social recognition
Statement
My research takes an integrative, comparative, and multi-disciplinary approach that draws on questions and methods from behavioral
ecology, evolutionary biology, comparative psychology, human psychoacoustics, and neurophysiology to investigate animal behavior, in
general, and animal acoustic communication, in particular. In my lab, we integrate mechanistic and evolutionary studies to provide
answers to fundamental questions about animal communication: (i) How do animals encode information about themselves in acoustic signals?
(ii) How do animals acquire information about other conspecifics through the perception of acoustic signals? (iii) How do these
processes function in natural habitats and noisy social environments? And (iv) how do these processes evolve? My principal study
organisms are frogs, in which acoustic communication mediates species recognition and sexual selection in terms of both female mate
choice and male-male competition.
My research currently focuses on two major questions. First, what is the role of acoustic signaling in mediating the aggressive
male-male interactions that arise from sexual selection and take place in social environments that are both temporally and spatially
variable? In this context, my work investigates vocally mediated social recognition, behavioral plasticity, learning, and honest
signaling in male frogs that defend calling sites or breeding territories, such as bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana), green frogs (Rana
clamitans), spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer) and strawberry dart-poison frogs (Dendrobates pumilio). Second, how do females
perceive the calls of a male in the noisy social environment of a dense chorus? In this context, I am investigating questions related
to “auditory scene analysis” and the “cocktail party problem” – two phenomena known from human hearing research – to understand how the
anuran auditory system forms “auditory objects” of acoustic signals and segregates the signals of one male from the background noise
of a chorus. This new aspect of my work will focus on female gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor), which are native to Minnesota, and
túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus), which are found in Central and South America.
Selected Publications
Bee MA (in press) Selective phonotaxis by male wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to the sounds of a chorus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Buschermöhle M, Feudel U, Bee MA, Klump GM, and Freund J (in press) Signal detection enhanced by comodulated noise. Fluctuation and Noise Letters
Gerhardt HC and Bee MA (in press) Recognition and localization of acoustic signals. In: Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians (eds. Feng AS and Narins PM), Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. Springer: New York.
Bee MA (in press) Animal communication: Individual recognition in animal species. In: The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics: Volume 2 (section editor, Naguib M), Elsevier Science.
Bee MA and Klump GM (2005) Auditory stream segregation in the songbird forebrain: Effects of time intervals on responses to interleaved tone sequences. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 66, 197-214.
Bee MA and Klump GM (2004) Primitive auditory stream segregation: A neurophysiological study in the songbird forebrain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1088-1104.
Bee MA (2004) Within-individual variation in bullfrog vocalizations: Implications for an acoustically mediated social recognition system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3770-3781.
Bee MA (2003) A test of the “dear enemy effect” in the strawberry dart-poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 601-610.
Bee MA (2003) Experience-based plasticity of acoustically evoked aggressive behavior in a territorial frog. Journal of Comparative Physiology A., 189, 485-496.
Marshall VT, Humfeld SC, and Bee MA (2003) Plasticity of aggressive signalling and its evolution in male spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer). Animal Behaviour, 65, 1223-1234.
Bee MA and Gerhardt HC, (2002) Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 269, 1443-1448.
Bee MA (2002) Territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) do not assess fighting ability based on size-related variation in acoustic signals. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 109-124.
Bee MA and Gerhardt HC (2001) Habituation as a mechanism of reduced aggression between adjacently territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 68-82.
Bee MA and Gerhardt HC (2001) Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. Animal Behaviour,, 62, 1129-1140.
Bee MA and Gerhardt HC (2001) Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): II. Perceptual basis. Animal Behaviour, 62, 1141-1150.
Additional Links
Animal Communication Lab Homepage
|